Click on the images for a
On the 6th of October in 1990 the Ulysses space mission was launched from NASA's space shuttle "Discovery." The Ulysses mission, placed a satellite into a polar orbit around the Sun that takes it far outside the ecliptic. The mission used the gravity of Jupiter to swing the satellite out of the ecliptic plane where solar measurements are inherently affected by the heliospheric current sheet that flows there. The deflection by the gravity of Jupiter has put the satellite it into an orbit perpendicular to the ecliptic where nothing disturbs the reading. The Ulysses satellite had reached Jupiter on the 8th of February in 1992. That's when its first solar orbit began.
The satellite delivered data for the next 16 years until it was turned off during its third orbit. In these years of operation it provided three major items of critical evidence. It measured over the span of its operation a 30% reduction in the solar wind pressure. That's a huge reduction for such a short period.
During its first path over the South Pole in 1994, the solar wind measurement was sharply disrupted. The interference left a gap in the measurements over the South Pole. The same happened again in 1995 over the North Pole of the Sun. The disruption phenomenon was observed for every path.
The disruption may have come as a surprise, but for an electrically powered sun, the gap is exactly what one would expect to see. It thereby provides evidence that the Sun is electrically powered by plasma focused on it via two major primer fields.
The disruption matches in principle the plasma-flow model that has been discovered in high-power laboratory experiments at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The disruptions occur where the focused interstellar plasma streams would connect with the Sun, which they obviously do.
The second major item of evidence that Ulysses has measured, is the astonishing 30% reduction in solar wind pressure between the first and third orbit. The surprise made headlines in the press. Shortly thereafter the mission was terminated. The satellite's transmitter was turned off, on the 30th of June in 2009.
The measured 30% drop in solar wind pressure in just 8 years, i enormous. In fact the reduction is gigantic for such a short period.
The reduced solar wind pressure had the secondary effect of weakening the shielding effect of the solar heliosphere around the solar system, which shields us against Galactic Cosmic-Ray flux. With the reduction in solar-wind pressure, the Ulysses satellite had measured a 20% increase in Cosmic-Ray flux over the same timeframe.
These are all hard items of evidence that big changes are in progress in the solar system. In an electric sun-system the solar wind can be likened to steam boiling off from a heated kettle. When the plasma input exceeds the density that the plasma-fusion reactions can consume, the excess pressure is vented off by the primer fields and becomes the solar wind. The solar wind measurements thereby become a measure of the 'health' of the solar system. When one sees a 30% drop in just eight years, such evidence becomes a cause for great concern.
If one projects the process forward in a linear manner on the basis of a 30% drop in 10 years, the solar wind will likely have diminished to zero by 2030. From this point on the solar radiation itself would begin to diminish progressively towards the Sun going inactive at some point. The cut-off event will likely happen between the 2030s and the 2050s. Once this happens the magnetic primer fields collapse. It will take a big increase in plasma-flow density for the primer fields to form anew. During the last glaciation period the recovery of the Sun occurred in intervals of 1470 years.
That primer fields can become established quickly when the conditions are right and vanish quickly when the conditions are exhausted, is evident in the occurrences of the Red Sprite events that occasionally become visible in the tropics high above large storms clouds. The sprite events fair up, but rarely last for more than a second. The larger event of our interglacial Sun has so far lasted for roughly 12,000 years, which is typical for interglacial periods.
Once the Sun goes inactive like a sprite turning off, it will likely continue to glow for a long time by residual processes, although at a much-reduced energy level, at probably 30% of the present level. The resulting enormous reduction in radiated energy would certainly be large enough to cause the gigantic Ice Age cooling that the ice cores tell us of.
The shock effect of the solar-fusion consumption of plasma being interrupted, may eventually recover the incoming plasma density enough for the Sun to start up again for a short period. The periodic nature of the Dansgaard Oeschger oscillations, suggest that such off/on/off events were happening throughout the last Ice Age, with the results as shown here.
This is the kind of rapid transition in the earth environment that we need to prepare our world for, which we need to complete in the few years of interglacial time that we may have remaining, possibly 30 years, if that.
The lead time that we may still have is short. It is short, because the entire discovery process of the ice age dynamics didn't begin until the early 1990s when the deep ice core drilling began and the Ulysses satellite was launched to explore the connection with the Sun.
The 'earlier' connection between the weaker Sun of the Maunder Minimum, and the colder climates at the time, had been on record, and fully out in the open, back in the 1600s, but no one had seen the connection. Nobody had connected the two events then..
We are back in the same boat again from the 1990s onward. The evidence of big events stands before us. The ice core evidence is plain. It has been measured in details and the measurements were recorded. The Ulysses spacecraft saw the solar system getting dramatically weaker while it orbited. But will we connect the dots?
Is is as if we needed a third set of evidence to jolt us to attention. This third set of measurements was produced on the ground in the high arctic of Canada in the form of magnetic measurements that tracked the Earth's magnetic pole 'drifting' northward. This is significant. But what does it mean? It means that we see evidence here of a dramatic weakening of the magnetic strength of the primer fields that are affecting the Earth's magnetic dynamo effect.
The magnetic effect of the spinning of the Earth, by the principle of magnetic fields, causes the magnetic field lines to be formed along the spin axis of the Earth. If no other factors are applied, the Earth magnetic North Pole becomes identical with the Earth geographic North Pole.
However, if one considers that the Earth orbits within the giant sphere of the primer fields, a second magnetic force affects the Earth.
If the second force, which has a different orientation, is extremely dominant, it will pull the effective magnetic pole into its direction, for a maximum deflection of 23 degrees according to the tilt of the spin-axis of the Earth. In 1831, at the time when the Earth recovered from the Little Ice Age, the measured deflection was 20 degrees. This was a large deflection, caused by strong primer fields. From this time on, slowly at first, the deflection of the Magnetic North Pole, as it was measured on the ground, drifted closer and closer towards the geographic pole. The measured drift tells us that the primer fields were weakening, whereby the dynamo field became increasingly more dominant.
That the magnetic pole drift was not caused by the Earth itself is evident by the corresponding weakening of the Sun that had been measured by the Ulysses spacecraft between 1992 and 2008. We are evidently looking at a large weakening of the solar system being in progress.
Of course, as the Little Ice Age tells us, the weakening of the solar system began already much earlier in time. The ice core samples from Greenland tell us that the weakening of the solar system began as far back as 3000 years ago, slowly at first, but has gradually accelerated.
The dramatic, fast weakening that Ulysses saw, which is evident also in the magnetic pole drift, suggests that a terminal phase has begun.
It is tempting to hope that the presently indicated trend will somehow reverse before the Sun goes inactive. Hasn't the solar system recovered from the Little Ice Age? Yes it has recovered, but it recovered from a stronger base.
The stronger base is evident in the stronger deflection of the magnetic pole by the primer fields. The deflection at the worst of the Little Ice Age hadn't drifted nearly as close to the geographic pole than we have it today. This means that the primer fields were far stronger then. This apparent paradox tells us that the effective field strength of the primer fields has not a singular source, but is the effective composite of three nested primer fields overlaid upon another.
It was theorized in 1932 by the Dutch astronomer Jan Oort and the Estonian astronomer Ernst Öpik, that a spherical cloud of asteroid objects surrounds the solar system up to a distance of close to a light year.
The cloud is theorized to be made up of two nested parts, an inner part that extends for less than a third of it, and a larger outer sphere. The Sun, located deep within it, is just a tiny speck.
If one regards this two-part giant phenomenon as a part of a large plasma flow system, and plasma concentration system, then we can recognize the existence, in principle, of a three-fold nested complex of primer fields with each having a correspondingly longer resonance characteristic.
The outer Oort cloud, by its size, would likely have a resonance that corresponds with the Dansgaard Oeschger oscillations during the glaciation period.
The long resonance of the outer Oort cloud may also be a causative element for the big spikes that we see as warming events in interglacial time.
The resonance of the inner Oort cloud, being much smaller in size, would be reflected in the shorter cyclical events such as we see in the 250-year cooling of the Little Ice Age, and the subsequent 250 year re-warming afterwards. The still-strong magnetic pole deflection during the Little Ice Age, suggests that there was still a lot of strength left in the outer Oort cloud, which we don't have this time around.
This is what the green line indicates. It means that the 250-year down-swing that has now begun, is beginning in a dramatically weaker environment. Without the strong backup that still existed during the Little Ice Age, the Sun will likely go inactive this time around, long before the current 250-year down-cycle has ended.
It is more likely that the diminishment of the solar wind pressure will accelerate instead of being reversed by a strong backup. No evidence exists that a backup is in the works for a significant reversal to take place.
Society is foolishly gambling with its very existence, by assuming that a reversal of the current dynamics will magically happen that would justify its refusal to prepare the world for the impending Ice Age transition in roughly 30 years.
The current gamble that that the near Ice Age will pass us by, is a gamble that all evidence tells us, we will loose. This is an insane gamble. To put it bluntly, the evidence tells us that we are on the fast track to an icy hell. The last ice age transition, measured in the ice of North Greenland, gives us a hint of what we are up against.
When all of this evidence is fitted together in the mind into a singe package of science perception, which takes us beyond what the eye can see, alarm bells should ring. The alarm bells should signal that the final phase towards the next glaciation event is most likely in progress, towards an inactive Sun, and that no form of gambling with the future existence of humanity is justified.
But why aren't the alarm bells ringing? The simple answer is that science is being depressed for political objectives by the masters of the world empires who have waged war against scientific progress for centuries. The reason was stated bluntly, and repeatedly, by the masters of the ruling empire. It has been stated that scientific progress is the greatest danger to any feudal oligarchic system of empire, because empire exists by the looting of society. Empire never stands on its own merits. It has none. Empire protects itself by keeping society small, impotent, and its science depressed.
The details involved are too many to list here, however a few points of evidence in modern time are noteworthy.
One point to note is, that the scientific community became concerned already in the early 1970s about what must be done to protect humanity against the approaching Ice Age. The scientific community called for a world forum to discuss the subject.
The world forum was convened in 1974, however, it was staged in upside down form as the U.N. Conference on Population in Bucharest where the announcement of the global warming doctrine was made, for which no evidence really exists, but which was immensely promoted thereafter.
In the shadow of the global warming doctrine that was essentially a hoax, the super-secret infamous NSSM-200 policy was quietly concocted in the same year, 1974, which targeted third world nations for controlled depopulation. The timing coincidence strongly colors the real intention for the global warming doctrine and takes it far outside the realm of science. Today, 30 years later, the global warming doctrine is murdering up to 100 million people a year with starvation by the mass-burning of food in the form of biofuels.
The scientific community protested against the perpetrated hoax that was barely becoming recognized then for what it was. The science community responded with numerous petition projects to inspire the leaders of the world to act on truthful scientific evidence instead of on contrived imperatives.
The largest of the resulting opposition projects garnered 17,000 signatures from the scientific community worldwide, but those became promptly ignored in the political world as the truth really wasn't on the agenda.
One opposition project that you have probably never heard of either, was launched by the US Senate. The project published 400 detailed statements of scientific opposition to the global warming doctrine, presented by concerned individuals with an academic degree. This massed voice too, was simply ignored.
One promoter of the political hoax project stated that each one in the scientific community must decide for himself were the balance lies between being 'truthful' and being 'effective.' On this platform, a banner has been erected high over the land of science, that reads, "In Lies We Trust."
Under the established banner many a published scientific data has evidently been sanitized by omissions or 'corrections'. Sometimes, however, 'the pollution of the truth' makes it briefly past the guards, and is seen by the public, as did the image shown here of a gigantic event over the North Pole of the Sun photographed by the SOHO spacecraft.
This image, with all its different spectra, was deleted from the published data on the next day. It is unknown to what extend published scientific data is routinely sanitized in order to assure 'the purity of the pabulum' that is dished up for society.
Often the pabulum is sweetened with fairytale dust. It was revealed, for example, during the time of the 2009 Climate Change Conference, that, based on the publication of several hundreds of emails collected from the servers of relevant institutions, that the bulk of the data that is fed to the public in support of the global warming scare, has simply been made up.
One of the early activists on the front for truth in science, was an atmospheric scientist who had been associated with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for 23 years and had served for 20 years as an Air Weather Officer for the U.S. Air Force. He describes in an article how the big international protest movements against false science had developed from 1992 on. This occurred with the big ice core drilling going on in the background.
The first big opposition movement in the science community, which most people never heard of, started in Germany in 1992 at the University of Heidelberg. It was followed up 5 years later at the University in Leipzig, and then again with a major effort organized in Oregon in the USA, and so on.
The great protest movements had produced over 50,000 signatures and statements from the scientific community from numerous countries, with numerous Nobel Laureates among the respondents.
The Heidelberg Appeal, that went out to the scientific community in 1992, was responded by over 4,000 scientists, including 69 Nobel Laureates from 69 countries. It was hoped that such a wide-based voice would have an impact on the policy makers at the Rio Earth Summit. Of course, since the truth was not on the agenda there, the voices from the science community weren't even heard.
Dr. Ellsaesser states that over 35 organizations had been publicly standing up against the global warming doctrine at the time, whose voices were simply ignored.
The Leipzig Declaration had solicited only meteorologists and climate specialists for a completely focused statement on the issue. It had collected 110 signatures from this highly specialized group. The resulting statements by leading-edge specialists in the field, was subsequently submitted to the Kyoto climate conference, but, there, as it had already become the norm by then, their voices were simply ignored.
In the shadow of this ban of the truth, the Oregon Petition Project against the global warming doctrine was launched. It was launched as a protest against the Kyoto agreements that were referred to by Russia's Academy of Science, as 'a global suicide pact.'
The Oregon Petition project went out to all scientists worldwide, to gain their written support for a campaign to urge the nations of the world to reject the Kyoto agreements. The world responded with 17,000 signatures from scientists, mostly with high degrees, standing in opposition to the unscientific assumptions of the global warming dogma. The project seemed to have succeeded significantly, as only a few nations have actually ratified the Kyoto agreements.
As I already noted, other protests followed in later years. One of these was the big 2007 Senate Report, which presents a collection of over 400 detailed opposing submissions, mostly from the academic community, each one outlying the individual's reason for opposing the global warming dogma. Their statements are all online. But by then, the issue of global warming, as a world issue, was already essentially dead, except as a political issue of insanity
The 2009 Copenhagen Climate Change conference, that was designed to revive the global warming hoax, promptly failed spectacularly. It collapsed without a single agreement. It had drifted insanely far into the realm of purely imperial objectives with no scientific foundation for anything, to support anything. At the end India simply walked out in disgust.
Hopefully, the still remaining forced opposition against the ice age dynamics, will some day soon, similarly, fizz out into nothing, as we are running out of time on this front.
Among the voices in the scientific community, warning of the return of the Ice Age, was the world-renowned atmospheric scientist and mountaineer, Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, who also served as chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw'. He wrote in a paper in 2003, that the transition period to the deep cold temperatures can be as short as 1 to 2 years, and can begin virtually without warning, or that the transition might unfold slowly over a span of 50 years.
The professor speaks to us as a world-renowned atmospheric scientist who has excavated ice out of 17 glaciers on 6 continents in a 50-year career. He warns us that the cyclical Ice Age transition is already half a millennium 'overdue.'
For the timing, Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, quotes other sources in his paper, that suggest that the transition may occur between 50 to 150 years from the present. More accurate forecasts were hard to make at the time, since the dynamics of primer fields had not been discovered in 2003. However, the professor points out at the end of his paper, that continuous on-the-ground temperature measurements taken at the Solar Terrestrial Institute in Irkutsk in Southern Siberia, have registered a sharp drop in annual average temperature, beginning in 1998, which became later confirmed by the solar measurements of NASA's Ulysses mission, and by corresponding measurements of magnetic pole drift in the high arctic of Canada and beyond.
And so, Professor Jaworowski. simply suggested, 'The Ice Age Is Coming', 'Get the fur coats out of the closet.'
The coming Ice Age is definitely not off the horizon in scientific thinking. It is just beginning to unfold. The subject is merely pushed off the stage for the time being, by political forces in defence of the western oligarchic imperial system that has no natural foundation to exist, and thus cannot exist in the light of honest scientific development, especially the huge development that is mandated by the ice age dynamics.
The enormous economic development that is required to prepare the world for human living under an inactive Sun, with 6000 new cities being built in the tropics for a million people each, mostly afloat, all with completely new industries and agriculture alongside, and with everything being constructed in the short span of 30 years, would sweep the imperial looting system out of existence. For this reason the very notion of the Ice Age Challenge is being resisted, and the related fields of evidence are being 'sanitized' into oblivion.
The result that we see here may answer the question that is sometimes asked about the near potential of the Sun going inactive and the lack of evidence for it in the sky. People ask, "why have no such events been detected with telescopes, or by the Kepler spacecraft that searches for faint intensity variations in stars as evidence for planets orbiting the distant stars? The mission searches for the faintest changes in light density. Wouldn't such a mission see a sun going inactive, somewhere?
The reason why no such events have been reported, may simply mean that these cases have either been sanitized out of existence by the planet-scanning computer software that is not programmed for large changes, or that such occurrences are sanitized by the parameters that limit the reporting of what is seen.
It may also be that not a single sun, of the 145,000 stars that the Kepler mission had monitored in its narrow field of vision, has gone inactive during its slightly over two-years of operation.
It may also be the case that solar cut-off events may not happen near our space for a few decades yet, till the weakening has sufficiently progressed, and even then, there may not be many candidates for it.
Our Sun is officially designated as a weak "yellow dwarf" which in addition is located in a relatively sparsely populated part of space where it is more vulnerable to weakening supply conditions.
Our Sun, as a G-Class star, is not a particularly strong star, though stronger than most.
Up to 88% of the stars in the galaxy are smaller and dimmer stars than our Sun with a radically lower rate of plasma consumption to sustain their lesser fusion reactions. The great giant stars, in comparison are rare, at less than 3/4 of a percent of the stars. The giants are typically located at the center of a large plasma supply system.
The F-Class stars, that are are slightly larger than our Sun and make up 3% of all the stars, are several times more luminous than our Sun, which means that they too, operate in a relatively strong supply system. Those stars may have been the class that was selected for study by the Kepler mission.
All this means that the stars the size of our Sun, which are up to 5 times dimmer, may be the most vulnerable of the stars to supply fluctuations, but might not have been studied by the Kepler mission, because of their lower intensity.
The Kepler spacecraft operates a single instrument, a photometer, which continually monitors the brightness of over 145,000 specifically selected stars in a fixed field of view. The selected stars may have been mostly the larger F-Class stars for their brightness, which would likely be less affected by weakening conditions in the space around their solar systems. All this means that it cannot be said that the Kepler mission has delivered absolute proof that no sun anywhere has ever gone inactive, as has been suggested. When the inactivation of a sun occurs, which should typically be rare and occur quickly, the result would likely be missed unless one specifically looks for such events.The Kepler mission, officially, detected no such events, nor was it designed to do so. It operated for a brief span from December 2009 till May 11, 2013. While it operated, a greater-than-expected noise to data ratio was experienced, from both the stars and the spacecraft itself, which means that the results were not as clean as expected and open to errors.
Some evidence, however, does exist, for the existence of inactive stars. The visible form of inactive stars is termed the white dwarf. White dwarf starts are shown here with a circle around them.
When a plasma-powered sun goes inactive, it continues to attract with its gravity whatever atomic material exists in its surrounding. The attracted material then filters down to the sun's core where the atoms become crushed by the still existing large gravity. The resulting nuclear fission in the core emits the tiny speck of bright light that is seen at the center of a previous sun. The brilliant light from the atomic fissioning would be rather small in size in comparison with the actual size of the then dark plasma sphere that once was a sun.
Of course this evidence too, of the inactive state of a Sun, is being sanitized into obscurity by the Big Bang related theory of the entropic universe where every sun is doomed to eventually collapse by explosion or implosion and is left to die away into nothing, with the white dwarf at the end stage.
Thus, the global landscape has become a landscape of many obviously false theories. The fascination with false theories has persisted from historic time to ours, such as the widely held theory that war is inevitable and beneficial; or the modern theory that nuclear war can be avoided with the terror-threat of wielding many tens of thousands of nuclear bombs; and also that an economy is benefitted by the processes of financial mass-looting; and that humanity will be saved by the coveted depopulation of the Earth with genocide, as we have it now in progress, and that such a pursuit is a sane objective, so that its fascism will stabilize the imperial landscape.
On the science front the evidently false theories have likewise many prominent candidates, such as the global warming theory; the theory of the Big Bang creation; the theory of the internally heated hydrogen-fusion Sun; the theories of neutron stars; theories about black holes in space; and about stars collapsing into super-nova shockwave fireworks.
Fortunately, as with all false theories, their dominant standing can fade into nothing when discoveries of truth raise perceptions to higher platforms where old hypothesis are simply superseded with higher hypothesis that bring us closer to the truth.
An error in science fades into nothing all by itself when the truth becomes more clearly recognized, understood, and acknowledged. This too is known since ancient days.
Here we see the path for our future, the path of human development built on scientific development. I like to predict that we stand at the threshold today for a breakout from many false doctrines that have kept us tied to the dust of the earth, the dust of impotence, for far too many ages already, whereby we discover us as human beings with a quality in scientific truthfulness and creative power that renders us collectively as the supreme being on Earth, second to none.
On this path of our self-discovery as humanity, we will meet the immense Ice Age Challenge most surely along the way of it, perhaps even as a secondary issue in the flow of the unfolding power of our universal humanity.